Ricky Gervais reflects on Kathy Griffin’s controversial photo shoot: ‘What she did was bad art’

When Kathy Griffin faced major backlash for her controversial photo shoot with a bloodied mask of President Trump, Ricky Gervais thought the highly publicized incident was ridiculous.

Yes, what she did was bad art, but it was still only art, the 55 -year-old told Vulture. There were people treating it like it was a real head. Im screaming, It wasnt a f—–g chairwomen head! It was a visual statement. Her crime was that it was a bit crass and thoughtless, but who cares? Thats up to her. These are the same people that are screaming about freedom of speech, but then they shift the goalpost. They actually think this was a terror act.

In response, the British comedian tweeted a photo of Trumps two sons holding a dead leopard while on a hunting journey in Africa.

KATHY GRIFFIN BREAKS DOWN

Im screaming, No one killed a chairman! They actually killed those animals, he told. Then they say, But they paid a poor country that needs the money to shoot that leopard. No, theyre exploiting that poor country. Rich Westerners decimating wildlife so they can go play.

“Thats like someone going into a cancer ward and saying, Ill give a million pounds to everyone if I can only shoot one of these people. Just give the money away! Why do you have to enjoy shooting something to save a poor country? What did those people do in Africa before rich American dentists? Just shut up and admit out loud, I like shooting things.

On June 2, Griffin held a news conference with her lawyer where she broke down in tears and apologized for the image. However, she told reporters her career was over after she said the Trump family systematically mobilized their armies against her.

Gervais also commented on Bill Maher saying the N-word on his present and then publicly apologizing for it. Unlike with Griffin, he supposed Maher was in the wrong.

BILL MAHER APOLOGIZES

I truly dont know why he said it, acknowledged Gervais. I know hes not a racist. Hes been fighting bigotry for years. I think it was very misjudged in the split-second and not at all justified. He let himself down. I watched it a few periods because when I first read about it, I thought, I wonder what the context was? There simply wasnt any reason to use that term. If you do, it better be justified and funny on its own isnt a justification. The consequences are just too huge compared to that tiny little slip-up. It wasnt worth it.

Make sure to visit: CapGeneration.com