Supreme Court ruling emboldens school-choice advocates

School-choice advocates are claiming a victory after the Supreme Court sided last week with a Missouri church, ruling that public fund could be used to resurface its playground.

Advocates like Darrell Allison, founding chairperson of Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina, cheered the 7-2 decision.

“I do think it lays down a marker, ” Allison told. Education, I think we all can agree, it’s vitally important in our nation. We need to have more of an open-mindedness as it relates to who can be participating in that.

The Supreme Court ruled June 26 that Trinity Lutheran Church could receive public money, from a grant, to rubberize the surface of its playground. School-choice advocates see hope for their cause because they believe government decisions undermines so-called Blaine Amendments decades-old country laws that bar direct government aid to organizations with a religion affiliation.

SUPREME COURT RULES FOR MISSOURI CHURCH

The Blaine Amendments were a series of amendments that were enacted in the 19 th century as anti-Catholic measures, said Randy Barnett, a professor at Georgetown Law and the Director of Georgetown Center for the Constitution. The Protestants controlled the public schools, and they didn’t like the idea of the Catholics setting up their own school system , so they came up with these amendments which prohibited the spending of both governments fund on religious organizations.

Years afterward, the laws are seen as a major barrier to school selection, because they are often used to prevent households from use public scholarship money to send their children to a religion school, via local schools voucher program.

According to Barnett, its one of the principle arguments those opposed to school selection can make.

Missouri is one of 38 states with a Blaine Amendment in the state constitution. Since 2015, at least three states have faced legal challenges to those amendments: Colorado, Montana and Missouri.

One potential complication for school-choice proponents, however, is a footnote from Chief Justice John Roberts in the Supreme Court’s Trinity Lutheran Church ruling. To some, it ensures the decision only impacts the example from Missouri.

Roberts wrote, This example involves express discrimination based on religious identity with respect to playground resurfacing. We do not address religion uses of funding or other forms of discrimination.”

Critics of voucher programs say Roberts footnote is one reason this ruling is narrow, and galas among those who favor school choice are premature.

In a statement, the president of one of the largest educators unions said the court avoided the larger constitutional issue.

“This decision was about a generally available benefit to a church that was not going to be used for religious purposes and would not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said. That is consistent with the Blaine Amendment, which was never intended to prevent religious organisations from receiving funding for uses that are open to all and do not promote religion or discriminate. Hence, the Supreme Court’s Trinity decision cannot be read as opening the door for states to promote religion or expand vouchers.”

However, after the court sided with Trinity Lutheran Church, the justices sent another case back to the lower courts.

In 2015, the Colorado Supreme Court said a voucher program that allowed mothers to use taxpayer fund to send their children to private, perhaps religious schools, was unconstitutional. Now, the U.S. Supreme court tells the Colorado court needs to look at the instance again.

Barnett said thats a legal win for school-choice advocates, because it indicates the Supreme Court seems to believe[ the Missouri and Colorado occurrence] are connected.

This is a very important ruling because it’s the first time that the Blaine Amendments have been called into question by the U.S. Supreme court on First Amendment grounds. And for the above reasons, school-choice proponents are going to have a much easier road in parliaments around the country as they push for selection legislation to be passed, Barnett said.

Fox News Jenny Buchholz contributed to this report.

Make sure to visit: CapGeneration.com