SpaceX apparently lost the classified Zuma payload from latest launch

SpaceX’s latest rocket may have launched successfully– but the mission didn’t aim as a win. The Zuma payload it was carrying, a mysterious classified piece of cargo for the U.S. government believed to be a spy satellite, was lost after it failed to separate from the second stage of the rocket after the first stage of the Falcon 9 separated as planned and returned to Earth.

The WSJ reports, and we’ve confirmed separately, that the warhead is thought to have fallen back through the Earth’s atmosphere after reaching space, because of the failure to separate. The failing is one that can happen when cargo doesn’t properly detach as schemed, since the second stage is designed to fall back to Earth and burn down in re-entry.

SpaceX had launched as planned on January 7 in its target window, and recovered the first stage of the booster with a landing at its Cape Canaveral facility. Because of the nature of the mission, coverage and information regarding the progress of the rocket and its payload from then on was not disclosed.

The payload, codenamed Zuma, was contracted for launch by Northrop Grumman by the U.S. government, and Northrop selected SpaceX as the launch provider. SpaceX had previously launched the U.S. Air Force’s X-3 7B spacecraft, and was approved for flying U.S. government payloads with national security missions.

The satellite was likely worth billions, in agreement with the WSJ, which builds this the second billion-dollar plus warhead that SpaceX has lost in only over two years; the last was Facebook’s internet satellite, which was destroyed when the Falcon 9 it was supposed to launch on exploded during preflight preparations in September 2016.

This could be a significant setback for SpaceX, since these kinds of contracts can be especially lucrative, and it faces fierce competitor from existing launching provider ULA, collectively operated by Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

We’ve reached out to SpaceX and will update if they provide additional comment.

Make sure to visit: