I have prostate cancer. But I am happy | George Monbiot

The three principles that define a good life will protect me from hopelessnes, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot

It came, as these things often do, like a gunshot on a quiet street: shocking and disorienting. In early December, my urine turned brown. The following day I felt feverish and observed it was difficult to pee. I soon realised I had a urinary tract infection. It was unpleasant, but seemed to be no big deal. Now I know that it might have saved my life.

The doctor told me this infection was unusual in a human of my age, and hinted at an underlying condition. So I had a blood test, which revealed that my prostate-specific antigen( PSA) levels were off the scale. An MRI scan and a mortifying biopsy confirmed my distrusts. Prostate cancer: all the smart young men have it this season.

On Monday, I go into surgery. The prostate gland is interred deep in the body, so removing it is a major operation: there are six entry points and it takes four hours. The procedure will hack at the roots of my manhood. Because of the damage that will be caused to the surrounding nerves, there’s a high risk of permanent erectile dysfunction. Because the urethra needs to be cut and reattached to the bladder, I will almost certainly suffer urinary incontinence for a few months, and perhaps permanently. Because the removal of part of the urethra retracts the penis, it appears to shrink, at the least until it is feasible to stretched back into shape.

I was offered a choice: revolutionary surgery or brachytherapy. This means implanting radioactive seeds in the parts of the prostate affected by cancer. Brachytherapy has fewer side effects, and recovery is much faster. But there’s a catch. If it fails to eliminate the cancer, there’s nothing more that can be done. This therapy sticks the prostate gland to the bowel and bladder, constructing surgery extremely difficult. Once you’ve had one dose of radiation, they won’t give you another. I was told that the the opportunities of brachytherapy working in my suit were between 70 and 80%. The odds were worse, in other words, than playing Russian roulette( which, with one bullet in a six-chambered revolver, gives you 83% ). Though I have a tendency to embrace risk, this was not an attractive option.

It would be easy to curse my luck and start to ask,” Why me ?” I have never smoked and scarcely drink; I have a ridiculously healthy diet and follow a severe fitness regime. I’m 20 or 30 years younger than most of the men I see in the waiting room. In other words, I would have had a lower danger of prostate cancer only if I had been female. And yet … I am happy. In fact, I’m happier than I was before my diagnosis. How can this be?

The reason is that I’ve sought to apply the three principles which, I believe, sit at the heart of a good life. The first is the most important: imagine how much worse it could be, rather than how much better.

When you are diagnosed with prostate cancer, your condition is ranked on the Gleason Score, which measures its level of aggressivenes. Mine is graded at seven out of 10. But this doesn’t tell me where I stand in general. I required another index to assess the severity of my condition, so I fabricated one: the Shitstorm Scale. How does my situation compare to those of people I know, who contend with other medical problems or family misfortunes? How does it compare to what might have been, had the cancer not been caught while it was still- apparently- confined to the prostate gland? How does it compare to innumerable other catastrophes that could have befallen me?

When I completed the exercising, I realised that this bad luck, far from being a cause of woe, is a reminder of how lucky I am. I have the love of my family and friends. I have the support of those with whom I work. I have the NHS. My Shitstorm Score is a mere two out of 10.

The tragedy of our times is that, rather than apply the most useful of English proverbs-” cheer up, it could be worse”- we are constantly induced to imagine how much better things could be. The rich listings and power lists with which the newspapers are filled, our wall-to-wall celebrity culture, the invidious billions spent on marketing and advertising, create an infrastructure of comparison that ensures we assure ourselves as deprived of what others possess. It is a formula for misery.

The second principle is this: change what you can change, accept what you can’t. This is not a formula for passivity- I’ve expended my working life trying to alter outcomes that might have seemed immovable to other people. The theme of my latest volume is that political failure is, at heart, a failing of imagination. But sometimes we simply have to accept an obstacle as insuperable. Fatalism in these circumstances is protective. I accept that my lap is in the lap of the gods.

So I will not rage against the morbidity this surgery might cause. I won’t find myself following Groucho Marx who, at persons under the age of 81, excellently lamented:” I’m going to Iowa to collect an award. Then I’m seeming at Carnegie Hall, it’s sold out. Then I’m sailing to France to pick up an honor from the French government. I’d give it all up for one erection .” And today there’s Viagra.

The third principle is this: do not let fear regulation their own lives. Dread hems us in, stops us from thinking clearly, and prevents us from either challenging persecution or engaging calmly with the impersonal fates. When I was told that this operation had an 80% opportunity of success, my first thought was ” that’s roughly the same as one of my kayaking trip-ups. And about twice as good as the chance of arising as a result of those investigations in West Papua and the Amazon “.

There are, I believe, three steps to overcoming fear: name it , normalise it, socialise it. For too long, cancer has been locked in the drawer labelled Things We Don’t Talk About. When we call it the Big C, it becomes, as the word suggests , not smaller, but larger in our intellects. He Who Must Not Be Named is diminished by being identified, and decreased further when he becomes a topic of daily conversation.

The super-volunteer Jeanne Chattoe, whom I interviewed recently for another column, reminded me that, merely 25 years ago, breast cancer was a taboo topic. Thanks to the amazing advocacy of its victims, this is almost impossible to imagine today. Now we need to do the same for other cancers. Let there be no more terrible secrets.

So I have sought to discuss my prostate cancer as I would discuss any other issue. I induce no apologies for subjecting you to the grisly details: the more familiar they become, the less horrifying. In doing so, I socialise my condition. Last month, I discussed the remarkable evidence suggesting that a caring community improves recovery and reduces mortality. In talking about my cancer with family and friends, I feel the love that I know will get me through this. The old strategy of suffering in silence could not have been more misguided.

I had intended to use this column to advise humen to get themselves tested. But since my diagnosis, we’ve discovered two things. The first is that prostate cancer has overtaken breast cancer to become the third biggest cancer killer in the UK. The second is that the standard appraisal ( the PSA blood test) is of limited use. As prostate cancer in its early stages is likely to produce no symptoms, it’s hard to see what humen can do to protect themselves. That urinary tract infection was a remarkably lucky break.

Instead, I urge you to support the efforts led by Prostate Cancer UK to develop a better exam. Breast cancer has attracted twice as much money and research as prostate cancer , not because ( as the Daily Mail suggests ) humen are the victims of injustice, but because women’s advocacy has been so effective. Campaigns such as Men Unitedand the Movember Foundationhave sought to bridge this gap, but there’s a long way to run. Prostate cancer is discriminatory: for reasons unknown, black men are twice as likely to suffer it as white humen. Receiving better testing and therapies is a matter of both importance and equity.

I will ride this out. I will own this disease, but I won’t be defined by it: I will not be prostrated by my prostate. I will be gone for a few cases weeks but when I return, I do solemnly swear I will still be the argumentative old git with whom you are familiar.

* George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist

* Prostate Cancer UK can be contacted on 0800 0748383

Make sure to visit: CapGeneration.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s