US proposes extra tariffs on $50B in Chinese products to protest tech theft

The Trump administration said Tuesday that it plans to slap 25 -percent tariffs on approximately 1,300 products from China in response to Beijing’s alleged stealing of U.S. intellectual property.

According to the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, the principally non-consumer products account for approximately $50 billion in annual importations. The items include industrial chemicals, motorcycles and medical devices.

However, the proposed tariffs would not take effect before a public remark period ends May 11.

The announcement comes 11 days after Trump levied “protective” tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum in response to what the administration has described as unfair trade practices.

In response, China raised import responsibilities on American pork, fruit, aluminum and other products. China’s government said earlier its imports of those goods last year totaled$ 3 billion.

The latest sanctions are designed to punish China for using strong-arm tactics in its drive to become a global technology power, including pressuring American companies to share technology in exchange for access to the Chinese market, forcing U.S. firms to license their technology in China on unfavorable terms and even hacking into U.S. companies’ computers to steal trade secrets.

The administration sought to draw up the listing in such a way that limits the impact of the tariffs — a taxation on importations — on American customers while hitting Chinese importations that is beneficial for Beijing’s sharp-elbowed tech policies.

As part of its complaint, the U.S. is bringing a WTO case against Chinese licensing public policies that set U.S. companies at a disadvantage.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C ., praised the proclamation in a statement, telling: “Nothing will ever change when it is necessary to China’s business practices until someone starts pushing back.

“It is not too much to ask for China to stop stealing intellectual property and open up their markets that are closed due to heavy-handed Chinese government barriers to foreign business enterprises, ” Graham said.

The Chinese embassy in Washington said it “strongly condemns” the planned tariffs, which it told “serves neither China’s interest , not the U.S. interest, even less the interest of the global economy.”

“As the Chinese saying goes, it is only polite to reciprocate, ” added the embassy, which said Beijing seeking ways relief from the World Trade Organization( WTO) and “take corresponding measures designed to equal scale and strength against U.S. products in accordance with Chinese law.”

Even representatives of the tech industry, which has complained for years that China has pilfered U.S. technology and discriminated against U.S. companies, were critical of the administration’s latest action.

“Unilateral tariffs may do more damage than good and do little to address the problems in China’s( intellectual property) and tech transfer policies, ” said John Frisbie, president of the U.S.-China Business Council.

And the Internet Association, which represents such companies such as Google, Facebook and Amazon, expressed concerns, too.

“There’s no doubt the U.S. government is possible and should address China’s trade practises, ” Melika Carroll, the association’s senior vice president of global government affairs. “But consumers and American job creators should not be caught in the crossfire . … These tariffs will leave our customers worse off, stifle growth and make it harder for the digital economy to succeed.”

In January, a federal court in Wisconsin convicted a Chinese producer of wind turbines, Sinovel Wind Group, of stealing trade secrets from the American company AMSC and nearly putting it out of business. And in 2014, a Pennsylvania grand jury indicted five officers in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on charges of hacking into the computers of Westinghouse, US Steel and other major American companies to steal information that would benefit their Chinese competitors.

The Associated Press contributed to this report .

Make sure to visit:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s