Trump’s feud with Amazon is really about the Washington Post’s success | Jill Abramson

The paper owned by Amazons CEO, Jeff Bezos, has relentlessly investigated the president and Trump is out for revenge

Donald Trump’s savage attacks on Jeff Bezos and Amazon mark a sharp escalation in the president’s attacks on the free press. Trump v Bezos is really a proxy war: the president’s ultimate target is the Washington Post, which Bezos purchased from the Graham family in 2013.

The Post’s return to financial health since 2013 has been good for the media, which flourishes on healthy competitor. Since Trump became president, the Post and the New York Times have engaged in a thrilling, old-fashioned newspaper war, with each trading off, day after day, with deep reported stories and scoops that hold the Trump administration to account. The Post has been relentless in investigating the Trump administration’s abuse of power and the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russia during the 2016 election.

Bezos isn’t known for ideological ardor or partisanship. He dedicated donations to support gay matrimony in his home nation, the other Washington, but hasn’t had a high political profile. Since the 2016 campaign, when Trump began attacking him on Twitter, Bezos has displayed restraint.

Despite the intensifying bitterness of Trump’s tweets about him, Bezos has avoided being positioned as Trump’s nemesis. To preserve its freshly recaptured global credibility, the Post can’t be seen as the opposition party.

Of all of Trump’s assaults on Bezos, the most poison lie is that he uses the Post to lobby for Amazon. When Bezos bought the paper, he did so with personal funds, to keep the newspaper’s interests and mission completely separate from Amazon’s. The Grahams would not have found him a fit owned if they supposed Bezos wanted to use the Post to wield influence.

According to the many journalists who work there, Bezos has had a light touch as owned, focusing on areas in which he can make a difference, such as improving the paper’s technology. He has entrusted the running of the paper to Marty Baron, hired by the former publisher Katharine Weymouth, whose contributions to safeguarding her inheritance have been insufficiently credited and appreciated.

If newspapers were originally foreign to Bezos, the Post’s special place in the history of American journalism has come to have great meaning for him, according to several close associates. In 2017, he purchased an antique clothes wringer, which is now displayed in a conference room at the Post’s downtown Washington DC headquarters that is dedicated to the Graham family.

The significance of the wringer is known by any student of Watergate. Furious over the Post’s coverage of Richard Nixon’s criminal cover-up, the then us attorney general, John Mitchell, threatened that “Katie Graham’s gonna get caught in a big fat wringer” if the Post continued publishing its Watergate tales. For years, Katharine Graham proudly wore a charm of a wringer on a necklace as the golden symbol of her defiance.

Graham risked fiscal wrecking by standing up to Nixon. Bezos, too, has much at risk. After a week of assaults from the president, Amazon considered its stock cost drop sharply( though it afterward recovered somewhat ). Bezos’s stratospheric net worth also took a reach.

There is real reason to fear that Trump can win his war against the press. He has significant friends, including Rupert Murdoch’s Fox empire and Sinclair Broadcasting, which controls local television stations across the country and is seeking to acquire more through a planned buy of the Tribune Company.

Katharine Graham, the publisher of the Washington Post, with executive editor Ben Bradlee in 1971. She risked fiscal ruin by standing up to Nixon. Photograph: Associated Press

Fox and Sinclair are conservative propaganda machines, eager to amplify Trump’s lies and support him at the barricades. The chorus of Sinclair newscasters spouting the same, Trump-inspired assaults on reputable news providers as” fake news” was nothing short of chilling.

A recent poll showed that a majority of Americans agree with the president’s rants about” fake news”, More than three in four among 803 American respondents, or 77%, said they believed major traditional television and newspaper media outlets report” fake news”, according to a Monmouth University poll released Monday.

It is the hour for Americans to stand up for the first amendment and to stand against the Foxes and Sinclairs. They should also stand with the Washington Post.

The president has very real legal, regulatory and spending tools at his disposal to retaliate against Bezos and Amazon for the Post’s unflinching coverage. On the revolutionary aim of the spectrum, there are antitrust laws to unfurl to break up the tech retail giant, which Trump says is wiping out Mom-and-Pop stores across America. There are regulatory tools, including demanding stricter privacy rules. There are billions in government contracts for cloud computing that could disappear.

Amazon is no angel, but Trump’s urge to punish it is for all the incorrect reasons, triggered by his churlishness over the Post’s coverage of him and his government. All of this could create a confrontation with the health risks to be every bit as dramatic as Graham’s clashes with Nixon in the 70 s. But as was true then, the president may end up being on the losing end of a White House war against the press.

Make sure to visit:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s