Trump judicial nominee Wendy Vitter won’t say if segregated schools are bad.

Asked whether she agreed with the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, federal judicial nominee Wendy Vitter hesitated.

During her confirmation hearing on Wednesday, April 11, Vitter, a nominee for a post in the Eastern District of Louisiana, was asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal( D-Connecticut) whether or not she agreed with the landmark civil right example that effectively ended legal segregation in schools.

“I don’t mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions — which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with, ” Vitter responded. “Again, my personal, political, or religious positions I would set aside.”

Pressed on the issues, Vitter refused to clarify whether or not she believed this was a decision the court get right or whether she agreed with it, but she did say she’d uphold precedents set by higher courts if confirmed. The answer promptly depicted the shock and ire of the Leadership Conference, a civil rights organisation founded in 1950.

Vitter’s history as an anti-abortion activist played a role in her hearing as well, when she was asked about Roe v. Wade.

At an anti-abortion rally in 2013, Vitter reportedly told, “Planned Parenthood says they promote women’s health. It is the saddest of ironies that they kill over 150,000 females a year. The first step in promoting women’s health is to let them live.”

When asked by Blumenthal whether or not she still believes her past statement, Vitter refused to answer, simply saying that she is “pro-life” but would set aside personal and religious positions if confirmed. At another point, Vitter was asked about past efforts to get booklets into physicians offices that falsely claimed abortions cause breast cancer and made a dubious connection between girls taking family planning and being murdered.

Vitter and family attend her husband David’s swearing in ceremony to the U.S. Senate. Photo by Alex Wong/ Getty Images.

Vitter is just one of many controversial Trump judicial nominees who would receive a lifetime appointment if confirmed.

Make sure to visit: CapGeneration.com

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s