A Russian firm accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 presidential election claimed Monday that the government hasn’t shown that it intentionally broke the law.
In a court filing, attorney Eric Dubelier claimed that the case against Concord Management and Consulting LLC “has absolutely nothing to do with any connects or is coordinating any candidate and the Russian Government.”
“The reason is obvious, and is political, ” Dubelier wrote. “To justify his own existence the Special Counsel has to indict a Russian- any Russian.”
The company is controlled by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a wealthy tycoon who was placed on a U.S. sanctions listing earlier this year and who has ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
In February, Concord was indicted on a single count of conspiracy to victimize the United States. Prosecutors say the company provided millions of dollars in funding to the Internet Research Agency, a Russian social media troll farm that investigators say sowed dissension in the U.S. political system from 2014 through 2017.
Dubelier entered a not guilty plea on Concord’s behalf in federal court in Washington last week. In Monday’s filing, the lawyer claimed that the indictment does not allege that the company intended to break the law, even though the specific laws at issue involve the government to show willfulness.
Attorneys for Concord want the magistrate to review the instructions attorneys dedicated to the grand jury that issued the indictment, which Dubelier called “facially invalid.”
The company is one of 16 defendants accused by Mueller of participating in a covert social information campaign aimed in part at helping Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton and the first to appear in court.
The Associated Press contributed to this report .
Make sure to visit: CapGeneration.com