Earlier this week Eric Lundgren was sentenced to 15 months in prison for selling what Microsoft claimed was ” forgery software ,” but which was in fact only recovery CDs loaded with data anyone can download for free. The company has now put up a blog post defining “the facts” straight-out, though it’s something of a limited decide of those facts.
” We are sharing the information collected now and answering publicly because we believe both Microsoft’s role in the case and the facts themselves are being falsified ,” the company wrote. But it carefully avoids the deliberate misconception about software that it promulgated in court.
That misconception, which vastly exaggerated Lundgren’s crime and led to the sentence he received, is simply to conflate software with a licence to operate that software. Without go into details( my original post spells it out at length) it maintained in court that the disc Lundgren was attempting to sell were equivalent to entire licensed operating systems, when they were simply recovery discs that any user, refurbisher, or producer can download and burn for free. Lundgren was going to sell them to repair shops for a quarter each so they could hand them out to people who needed them.
Hardly anyone even builds these discs any more, surely not Microsoft, and they’re pretty much worthless without a licensed transcript of the OS in the first place. But Microsoft persuaded the judges that a piece of software with no license or product key — meaning it won’t work properly, if at all — is worth the same as one with a license.
Lundgren had already pleaded guilty to infringing Dell’s trademark by copying the appear of its disc, but the value Microsoft convinced the magistrates those discs have( a total of $700,000) immediately led to his 15 -month sentence.
Anyway, the company isn’t happy with the appear it has of sending a guy to prison for stealing something with no value to anyone but someone with a hobo computer and no backup. It summarizes what it thinks are the most important points as follows, with my commentary in accordance with the bullets.
Microsoft did not bring this case : U.S. Customs referred the case to federal prosecutors after intercepting the transport of forgery software imported from China by Mr. Lundgren.
This is perfectly true, however Microsoft has continually falsified the nature and value of the disc, falsely claiming that they led to lost sales. That’s not possible, of course, since Microsoft devotes the contents of these discs away for free. It sells licenses to operate Windows, something you’d have to have already if you wanted to use the discs in the first place.
Lundgren established an elaborate forgery supply chain in China : Mr. Lundgren traveled extensively in China to set up a production line and designed counterfeit molds for Microsoft software in order to unlawfully manufacture counterfeit disc in significant volumes.
Microsoft is trying to make it sound like the guy is some criminal mastermind operating some big time Windows pirating empire. He literally gave a Dell recovery disc to a duplication shop and told them to attain exact copies of it, including the label and paper sleeve.
Lundgren failed to stop after being alerted : Mr. Lundgren was even cautioned by a customs seizure notice that his conduct was illegal and given the opportunity to stop before he was prosecuted.
I can’t speak to this one, but Lundgren told me that the first notification he had that this was being pursued by anyone was when they raided his house. The monetary value of the disc was so small and the counterfeiting piece so minor( fake labels for duplications of disc that Dell doesn’t even offer any more) that if anything it would be a penalty and confiscation of the shipment , not a 5-year case alleging millions in damages.
Lundgren pleaded guilty: The counterfeit disc obtained by Mr. Lundgren were sold to refurbishers in the United States for his personal profit and Mr. Lundgren and his codefendant both pleaded guilty to federal felony crimes.
Lundgren pleaded guilty to counterfeiting the Dell discs , not to counterfeiting Microsoft software. It’s an important distinction because the disc are nearly worthless and copyright crimes are sentenced based on the value of the infringed item.
Lundgren went to great lengths to mislead people : His own emails submitted as evidence in the case demonstrate the lengths to which Mr. Lundgren ran in an attempt to stimulate his counterfeit software look like genuine software. They also prove him directing his co-defendant to detect less discerning customers who would be more easily deluded if people objected to the counterfeits.
Printing an accurate copy of a label for a disc isn’t exactly “great lengths.” Early on the company in China published” Made in USA” on the disc and” Constructed in Canada” on the sleeve, and had a yellow background when it should have been green — that’s the kind of thing he was fixing.
Lundgren intended to profit from his actions : His own emails submitted as evidence before the court make clear that Mr. Lundgren’s motivation was to sell counterfeit software to generate income for himself.
The plan was to sell these virtually worthless disc — remember, anybody can make one for free — for a quarter each to refurbishers. Records, however, show that Lundgren had sold several thousand to one purchaser for$ 3-4 each, which is contrary to this assertion. I’ve asked him for clarification on this.
Microsoft has a strong program to support legitimate refurbishers and recyclers : Our program supports hundreds of legitimate recyclers, while protecting customers.
The implication is that that Lundgren is not a legitimate refurbisher or recycler. He pointed out earlier, however, that his company, which handles recycling for Lenovo, Nintendo, and others, takes care of more e-waste in a year than Microsoft has in a decade.
When a refurbisher installs a fresh version of Windows on a refurbished PC, we charge a discounted rate of $25 for the software and a new license- “its not” free.
But if they’re not installing a fresh version of Windows, because the machine already has a licensed copy on it, as so many do, the software is free. There’s no limit on how many a company can build on its own; Microsoft only charges for the licenses. Here, go make one yourself in case you need to do it.
Mr. Lundgren’s scheme was simple. He was counterfeiting Windows software in China and importing it to the United States. Mr. Lundgren aimed the software to be sold to the refurbisher community as if it was a legitimate, licensed transcript of Windows.
There’s the key right there.” As if it was a legitimate, licensed copy of Windows .”
These are not licensed copies of Windows! They’re discs everyone can induce, and that manufacturers and refurbishers can print as many of as they like, to give to customers who already have a copy of Windows. These disc are for repairing or re-installing a copy of the OS. They did not come with licenses and Lundgren was not selling or licenses.
Don’t let Microsoft fool you the route they helped fool the judges. A recovery disc is something you or I or a refurbisher can make right now for free. A license to operate Windows comes from Microsoft and costs good fund. They’re not the same thing and Lundgren was going to sell the former , not the latter.
I’ve asked Microsoft to explain this last point and will update the post if I hear back.